Is trash2009.com a valid email domain?
trash2009.com has working mail routing: 2 MX records pointing, led by mail1.trash2009.com.
It appears on our list of disposable and throwaway email domains.
SPF is published and ends with ~all. DMARC is set to none.
Check an email address at trash2009.com
Type the name before the @ to check a full address. No account needed.
MX records
| Priority | Mail server | Resolves to |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | mail1.trash2009.com | 195.189.155.205, 195.189.155.206 |
| 10 | mail2.trash2009.com | 195.189.155.174, 195.189.155.205 |
SPF
Record published
v=spf1 a mx ~all
DMARC
Policy: none
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.feed.rua@trash2009.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc.feed.ruf@trash2009.com; fo=1
Disposable?
Yes, listed as a disposable email domain.
Free provider?
Yes, a free public mailbox provider.
What this means for your email list
Should you accept addresses at this domain?
Probably not. Throwaway services like trash2009.com give out inboxes that people abandon within minutes, so a signup with this domain rarely turns into a customer. Blocking it at the form keeps fake accounts and wasted emails out of your list.
Sender authentication
trash2009.com has DMARC in monitoring mode (p=none). It collects reports but does not yet block spoofed mail, so the domain is easier to impersonate.
✨ Report summary
Sign up to get a report summary: a plain-English read of this domain's mail setup and what to do next.
Sign up to get a report summary →Frequently asked questions
- Is trash2009.com a valid email domain?
- Yes. trash2009.com publishes 2 MX records and can receive email. Whether a particular mailbox exists is a separate question that only a mailbox check can answer.
- Is trash2009.com a disposable email domain?
- Yes. trash2009.com is on our list of disposable and temporary email domains, so most services block it.
- What are the MX records for trash2009.com?
- mail1.trash2009.com (priority 10); mail2.trash2009.com (priority 10).
- Does trash2009.com have SPF and DMARC?
- SPF: yes, ending ~all. DMARC: yes, policy none.