Is kulturbetrieb.info a valid email domain?
Mail for kulturbetrieb.info is handled by 1 server, with box.m1lf.party tried first.
It appears on our list of disposable and throwaway email domains.
SPF is published and ends with -all. DMARC is set to reject.
Check an email address at kulturbetrieb.info
Type the name before the @ to check a full address. No account needed.
MX records
| Priority | Mail server | Resolves to |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | box.m1lf.party | 89.58.3.144, 2a03:4000:5d:ce:dead:c0de:bad:babe |
SPF
Record published
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.m1lf.party -all
DMARC
Policy: reject
v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=r; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.m1lf.party; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400
Disposable?
Yes, listed as a disposable email domain.
Free provider?
Yes, a free public mailbox provider.
What this means for your email list
Should you accept addresses at this domain?
Treat these as low-value. People use kulturbetrieb.info to avoid giving a real address, so the contact is unlikely to reply, buy or come back. A real-time check at signup stops them before they enter your list.
Sender authentication
kulturbetrieb.info has a strict DMARC policy (reject): mail that fails authentication is refused, which protects its brand from spoofing and means anyone sending as kulturbetrieb.info must have SPF and DKIM set up correctly.
✨ Report summary
Sign up to get a report summary: a plain-English read of this domain's mail setup and what to do next.
Sign up to get a report summary →Frequently asked questions
- Is kulturbetrieb.info a valid email domain?
- Yes. kulturbetrieb.info publishes 1 MX record and can receive email. Whether a particular mailbox exists is a separate question that only a mailbox check can answer.
- Is kulturbetrieb.info a disposable email domain?
- Yes. kulturbetrieb.info is on our list of disposable and temporary email domains, so most services block it.
- What are the MX records for kulturbetrieb.info?
- box.m1lf.party (priority 10).
- Does kulturbetrieb.info have SPF and DMARC?
- SPF: yes, ending -all. DMARC: yes, policy reject.